Close Ad Frame
Bubbles?
2011 saw a sharp increase in the number of claims of 'cappuccino' bunkers - but what really constitutes entrained air in bunkers?
SUBSCRIPTION REQUIRED

To read this news article you need a subscription to Bunkerworld which includes the News Module.

   
ALREADY A MEMBER?

Username:
Password:
 
 
 remember me on this computer
Comments on this Article
STEPHEN FINDLAY
25th January 2012
Interesting article and particularly given that I am involved in the investigation of a number of "cappuccino effect" issues at the moment. Most of the bunker delivery shortfalls tend to be around 20mt to 50mt but I have one particular case that involves a shortage of 250mt and this represents around 30% of the total product alleged to have been supplied. There are rumours that Nitrogen is somehow introduced into the fuel at or prior to delivery and I would be interested to know if there have been any similar reports.
Douglas Raitt - Lloyd's Register FOBAS
31st January 2012
Hi Steve, to our knowledge there have not been similar reports. It is hard to see why anyone would resort to such a tactic as Nitrogen is a high premium product and there would appear to be little benefit in using nitrogen as opposed to (free) air in such situations. Air, in any case, consists of 79% nitrogen after all. If this in an actual scam it would have to be quite sophisticated in order to have the required nitrogen on hand. However, it's difficult to fathom a good reason why anyone would go through all that trouble. It may be the case if the nitrogen takes much longer to migrate out of the oil (till the receiver is well over the horizon), but even so, any sample drawn out of the bunkers would still have the appearance of an aero chocolate bar.

Of course, since any Residual Fuel Oil can be 0.2% - 0.8% (even over 1%) elemental nitrogen, anything up to those limits should not be taken as a sign that nitrogen has been deliberately introduced into the fuel.
STEPHEN FINDLAY
18th March 2012
Many thanks for your reply/comments Douglas and yes, I would agree that using Nitrogen seems to be a rather pointless and indeed difficult means of inflating the product. We are presently carrying out tests using various gases and chemicals as we now have a very similar case involving a shortage of 330mt on a delivery of 1750mt. This is clearly becoming a somewhat serious issue that may well lead to significant consequences involving bunkering operations at Singapore.
Jerry Wang - Ascenz Solutions Pte Ltd
30th March 2012
Emerson mass bunker flow meter can take care of aeration issue in bunkering.
Oleg Micevic - Cross Keys Marketing Pte Ltd
11th April 2012
Dear Steve and Jerry,

I dont think it is necessary to have a mass flow meter to detect a loss of 20% of delivered bunker fuel.
Also, with losses on that scale it would be probably wiser to investigate the individuals involved in this transaction on all sides and report it to the relevant authorities.
Robert Markoja - CiDRA Corporate Services Inc.
12th April 2012
This is a very interesting blod. I have had 2 inquiries within 3 days regarding air entrainment in bunker fuels. Both inquiries were from companies interested in determining the amount of air in the bunker fuel that became apparent to them after a couple of days following natural de-aeration or settling of the oil. The CiDRA SONARtrac GVF-100 Gas Volume Fraction meter can be used to assess the amount of entrained air in bunker oil during transfer to ship. The GVF-100 clamps on the outside of a pipe and is able to provide real time entrained air measurements in the range of 0-20% air / gas by volume. This equipment has been used to correct positive displacement flow meters used for crude custody transfer and with coriolis meters used on 2-phase separators for oil field applications.
Shishir Dutt - Tolani Maritime Institute
14th April 2012
Dear Robert ,
Can you please comment on the initial cost , working principle , size and operation of this GVF-100 gas volume fraction meter . Which company has designed the same and it will be great if you can cite some examples where it has actually been on continuous use during each bunkering operation
STEPHEN FINDLAY
17th April 2012
Hi Robert and Jerry. Whilst I am sure the equipment may help in reducing losses due to air or gas inflation of fuel delivered to a vessel, the crux of the issue is that it is something which is clearly happening, mainly at Singapore I believe, and absolutely nothing is being done about it. I have six shortage cases on my desk at the moment and doubtless there are many more out there. What is needed is a forum whereby shipowners and shipcharterers who purchase fuel and then encounter such shortfalls, can identify the suppliers, supplying barges and surveyors involved. Of the six cases on my desk, two involve the same bunker barge and it may be that there are many other similar cases out there with that particular barge.

If anyone has any similar cases or experiences please email me at steve@findlaymarine.com
Post your Comments on this Article

Please sign in by clicking here to post comments.

Not registered? Click here and register for FREE.